While at first glance there no definitive reasons to think so,
there are some irrefutable facts that may, over time, repudiate this
current position.
However, if we are to believe the conflicted results of numerous studies delivered by various scientists that radio waves from cell phones cause cancer are (and conversely, are not) powerful enough to cause us to investigate this. The introduction of "protection" that is now becoming more readily available against all manner of cancer-causing electromagnetic radiation (EMR) suggests it is a more serious concern than ever before. But, if this is the case why are the studies and controversy continuing?
While the answer may simply lie in the fear of the unknown, public pronouncements that seem to be ever more prevalent in print and other media, abound. Week after week, more and more mainstream publications, like TIME, NEWSWEEK, GENTLEMEN's QUARTERLY and even POPULAR SCIENCE have published article that "appear to validate the fact" that the effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) pollution is indeed a valid risk that we cannot ignore, no matter our views. In essence it is virtually akin to the medical posture taken a century or so ago when the surgeons of the day performed their "miracle" in circumstances and places that would thoroughly appall us today. It certainly begs the same question, "could it be that we simply cannot envision the risk, that today's incomplete science blinds us to the truth?" When we look back a century from now will our minds still be as closed or will the revelations make us consider then that which we should have done now, in the 21st Century?
The most recent public pronouncement by technological giant, Samsung, who has publicly stated, recently, that watching the new 3D TV System can be "hazardous to your health." They even suggest not placing the units "close to stairs" as it could cause people to fall and be injured. Is this from the radiation or the technology? Only time will provide the definitive answer! Will this turn out to be the equivalent of today's "cell phones cause cancer" dialogue, confusing and confounding for experts and may people alike?
Science tells us that known cancer-inducing agents i.e. certain chemicals, viruses and radiation - act by breaking chemical bonds to produce DNA mutations While radiation is evident in many forms, one type Ionizing radiation identifies a category that includes gamma rays, x-rays, most ultraviolet (UV) light and certain subatomic particles. Their energy is high enough to detach an electron from an atom. A second type, the lower-energy, non-ionizing radiation from light bulbs and cell phones (both part of the electromagnetic spectrum) may not do damage except when absorbed in more concentrated quantities. In the case of cell phones radiation it can deposit harmful heat and eventually affecting circulating blood, unless some mechanism is able to disperse the concentration. Still, there's something unsettling about battering your brain with supposedly innocuous radio waves
In 2008, the Director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Dr. Herberman, stunned his Institute colleagues with what may have been the first definitive warning on the cell phone cancer link which he addressed to some 3,000 staffers and said "there is "sufficient data" to warrant issuing an advisory... on cell phone use." The Doctor was addressing the fear of the unknown that current studies that we have underway, or completed, are unable to categorically rule on the long terms risks from the questions "does cell phones cause cancer?"
His worry emanated from the 10-year follow-up on a 2004 Swedish study for 750 individuals who identified several factors of concern. Also, a 2007 Swedish review found that younger brains might be at a greater cancer risk, after extended use.
While several wider based European studies did not conclusively find evidence to the contrary, it was determined that lifestyle factors could pose a far greater influence. However, reports of dizziness and headaches - so called electromagnetic hypersensitivity - that occurred might be due to holding an object against your head for an extended period.
Still while these and other studies don't reveal a specific cancer link currently existing, it is important to take steps to "filter out" or remove to as great a practical extent as possible, the influence of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) pollution from our surroundings.
Electromagnetic pollution not only affect people but is has been found to impact our pets and non-domesticated animals too. One particular study found a link between microwaves and cataracts in domestic pets. Children too have now been diagnosed autistic and that the cause does seem relate specifically to electromagnetic radiation. Use of protective devices, however, seems to offer some relief or improvement.
In 2002, a Carlsbad-based Company, now known at GIA WELLNESS took a stand in the environmental pollution war and developed and patented devices to inhibit electromagnetic radiation pollution. These ranged from personal "tools" for cell phones, laptop and other devices and on into whole house harmonizers and items that offered protection in an individual's environment. New products to reflect the needs of people are being patented for release shortly.
To most people, skeptical as they are, Dr. Alfred Hanser, Co-Founder of GIA WELLNESS devised a simple stress test that clearly showed the individual being tested that there was an issue. The simple test is carried out by having an individual stand feet together and hands in the extended "prayer" position. An effort is made to upset the balance of the study participant, and a note is made of the "tipping" position where balance becomes unstable. The test is then repeated with the participant holding their cell phone, which is active. The results are stunningly different. The participant becomes more unstable earlier. Next the test is repeated again, with the cell phone activated but with the addition of a protective device, or inhibitor. The results are generally even better than the first time test. As a result, people can quickly see the impact of their cell phone and how it affects their wellness.
It is further confirmation that electromagnetic radiation pollution is impactful and a health concern that will indeed come to be recognized for the dangers.
A recent story in POPULAR SCIENCE covered a man living in Sweden whose life was adversely impacted by ANY environmental pollution, no, matter how inconsequential it may seem to us. Removal of all pollutants was the only way for his quality of life to be improved upon, and it was!
We are impacted and bombarded on a daily basis with electromagnetic radiation. It is found all around us. It can be your electric can opener or vacuum cleaner. Or, it can be the cell phone tower that may lie close to your dwelling or office or even the high voltage transmission lines. These have all been found to cause environmental pollution and even cause debilitating illnesses. But, the good news is that patented protection devices can quickly and easily improve your quality of life. Cell phone cancer may not yet be quantified but the impacts of electromagnetic radiation are here and now. And, they are here to stay. Your only option is protection for you, yourself, your family and your pets too!
Source : http://www.barronstreasures.com
However, if we are to believe the conflicted results of numerous studies delivered by various scientists that radio waves from cell phones cause cancer are (and conversely, are not) powerful enough to cause us to investigate this. The introduction of "protection" that is now becoming more readily available against all manner of cancer-causing electromagnetic radiation (EMR) suggests it is a more serious concern than ever before. But, if this is the case why are the studies and controversy continuing?
While the answer may simply lie in the fear of the unknown, public pronouncements that seem to be ever more prevalent in print and other media, abound. Week after week, more and more mainstream publications, like TIME, NEWSWEEK, GENTLEMEN's QUARTERLY and even POPULAR SCIENCE have published article that "appear to validate the fact" that the effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) pollution is indeed a valid risk that we cannot ignore, no matter our views. In essence it is virtually akin to the medical posture taken a century or so ago when the surgeons of the day performed their "miracle" in circumstances and places that would thoroughly appall us today. It certainly begs the same question, "could it be that we simply cannot envision the risk, that today's incomplete science blinds us to the truth?" When we look back a century from now will our minds still be as closed or will the revelations make us consider then that which we should have done now, in the 21st Century?
The most recent public pronouncement by technological giant, Samsung, who has publicly stated, recently, that watching the new 3D TV System can be "hazardous to your health." They even suggest not placing the units "close to stairs" as it could cause people to fall and be injured. Is this from the radiation or the technology? Only time will provide the definitive answer! Will this turn out to be the equivalent of today's "cell phones cause cancer" dialogue, confusing and confounding for experts and may people alike?
Science tells us that known cancer-inducing agents i.e. certain chemicals, viruses and radiation - act by breaking chemical bonds to produce DNA mutations While radiation is evident in many forms, one type Ionizing radiation identifies a category that includes gamma rays, x-rays, most ultraviolet (UV) light and certain subatomic particles. Their energy is high enough to detach an electron from an atom. A second type, the lower-energy, non-ionizing radiation from light bulbs and cell phones (both part of the electromagnetic spectrum) may not do damage except when absorbed in more concentrated quantities. In the case of cell phones radiation it can deposit harmful heat and eventually affecting circulating blood, unless some mechanism is able to disperse the concentration. Still, there's something unsettling about battering your brain with supposedly innocuous radio waves
In 2008, the Director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Dr. Herberman, stunned his Institute colleagues with what may have been the first definitive warning on the cell phone cancer link which he addressed to some 3,000 staffers and said "there is "sufficient data" to warrant issuing an advisory... on cell phone use." The Doctor was addressing the fear of the unknown that current studies that we have underway, or completed, are unable to categorically rule on the long terms risks from the questions "does cell phones cause cancer?"
His worry emanated from the 10-year follow-up on a 2004 Swedish study for 750 individuals who identified several factors of concern. Also, a 2007 Swedish review found that younger brains might be at a greater cancer risk, after extended use.
While several wider based European studies did not conclusively find evidence to the contrary, it was determined that lifestyle factors could pose a far greater influence. However, reports of dizziness and headaches - so called electromagnetic hypersensitivity - that occurred might be due to holding an object against your head for an extended period.
Still while these and other studies don't reveal a specific cancer link currently existing, it is important to take steps to "filter out" or remove to as great a practical extent as possible, the influence of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) pollution from our surroundings.
Electromagnetic pollution not only affect people but is has been found to impact our pets and non-domesticated animals too. One particular study found a link between microwaves and cataracts in domestic pets. Children too have now been diagnosed autistic and that the cause does seem relate specifically to electromagnetic radiation. Use of protective devices, however, seems to offer some relief or improvement.
In 2002, a Carlsbad-based Company, now known at GIA WELLNESS took a stand in the environmental pollution war and developed and patented devices to inhibit electromagnetic radiation pollution. These ranged from personal "tools" for cell phones, laptop and other devices and on into whole house harmonizers and items that offered protection in an individual's environment. New products to reflect the needs of people are being patented for release shortly.
To most people, skeptical as they are, Dr. Alfred Hanser, Co-Founder of GIA WELLNESS devised a simple stress test that clearly showed the individual being tested that there was an issue. The simple test is carried out by having an individual stand feet together and hands in the extended "prayer" position. An effort is made to upset the balance of the study participant, and a note is made of the "tipping" position where balance becomes unstable. The test is then repeated with the participant holding their cell phone, which is active. The results are stunningly different. The participant becomes more unstable earlier. Next the test is repeated again, with the cell phone activated but with the addition of a protective device, or inhibitor. The results are generally even better than the first time test. As a result, people can quickly see the impact of their cell phone and how it affects their wellness.
It is further confirmation that electromagnetic radiation pollution is impactful and a health concern that will indeed come to be recognized for the dangers.
A recent story in POPULAR SCIENCE covered a man living in Sweden whose life was adversely impacted by ANY environmental pollution, no, matter how inconsequential it may seem to us. Removal of all pollutants was the only way for his quality of life to be improved upon, and it was!
We are impacted and bombarded on a daily basis with electromagnetic radiation. It is found all around us. It can be your electric can opener or vacuum cleaner. Or, it can be the cell phone tower that may lie close to your dwelling or office or even the high voltage transmission lines. These have all been found to cause environmental pollution and even cause debilitating illnesses. But, the good news is that patented protection devices can quickly and easily improve your quality of life. Cell phone cancer may not yet be quantified but the impacts of electromagnetic radiation are here and now. And, they are here to stay. Your only option is protection for you, yourself, your family and your pets too!
Source : http://www.barronstreasures.com
0 Response to "Do Cell Phones Cause Cancer?"
Post a Comment